The Assignment:
- Create a Digg account.
- Create an account on Yahoo Buzz.
- Follow the Digg and Yahoo Buzz sites for a minimum of one week, two would be better. In addition to Digg and Buzz, continue following the blogs you have been reading since the beginning of the class. During this time period you need to Digg or Buzz five blog posts or news articles. If the story or post does not have a Digg or Buzz link, you may submit the story or post to the Digg and Buzz sites.
- Create a blog post describing:
- Which of the two tools you like best and why.
- Why you will or will not continue to use Digg and/or Buzz.
- How these tools could be used in your classroom with students.
- If you see social implications (good or bad) to these types of tools.
- Tag this post appropriately and make certain web2.0inpusd is one of the tags.
Submit the address of your blog post as part of this assignment by clicking the “Edit my submission” button below.
Total Points = 25
Which of the two tools you like best and why.
I have created accounts in both Digg and Buzz. So far I think I like Digg better but I will have to give it some time. The one issues with these (as you mention) is that each time you find another application you have a choice to switch to it or stay with something you are familiar with. I consider the time it takes to figure out the nuances of a new application and what it really offers me that is that different. It has to offer a LOT that is significantly better for me to switch. It takes too long to get used to one.
One positive thing about YahooBuzz is that you don’t need a new password (if you have a yahoo account) however, it appears that Digg lets you filter out the news you want (at least I have not found a way yet to do this on Buzz.)
I am not that interested in “celebrity news” for example, and would happily dump all of it. This week might be the wrong week to do these but when you ask people to vote on what is important . . . you get a lot about Michael Jackson dying. It is sad, but so was much of his life, in my view, and I don’t really see that it is as important as war, the economy, the environment and many other issues (N. Korea threatening to shoot down Japanese aircraft and fire missiles toward Hawaii!).
Why you will or will not continue to use Digg and/or Buzz.
I think I will continue to use Digg.
On Buzz the entire front page is Billy Mays dying, Michael Jackson, sports, and who is the sexiest woman. Give me a break. This indicates the strength and weakness of “democracy” in that we all can vote on “what is important” however, the result is that you get a lot of emotional chatter . . . instead of what might be more important. But, it gives people what they want. So far, I want Digg because I have more control over weeding out the chatter.
If you see social implications (good or bad) to these types of tools.
I see a big issue here: where does our news come from?
In the past there were large newspapers (and later radio and TV) who spent money looking for news. They hired reporters and investigated stories. In the early days (until 1980s) the news divisions of major TV networks were NOT expected to turn a profit. They were considered “public trust” and necessary for a society – a free society – to function.
Not so today. Today – we sell the “news” – networks expect “news” (and lots of what I see on these “news” TV shows are not news at all in my view) to make money, sell products, bring in viewers.
The quickest way to bring in viewers is to tell them what they want to hear; don’t challenge them to think, but simply parrot back to them simple, clear emotional messages – with little, or NO analysis (which can be complicated and requires reason and consideration).
Worse yet, as we have more and more “news” flying about the inter-net and more and more ways to get the news (Digg and all the others) the question is WHO is creating this news? Digg doesn’t have reporters, Yahoo news doesn’t, google doesn’t . . . the newspapers that used to are going out of business (partially because they can’t make a profit giving away the news to all these other outlets).
Many TV “news” programs do NO investigation of anything – they simply take what others have given them and put their own spin on the story. So, it is great that I can find thousands of news stories a day on any topic imaginable – but – without journalists who actually ask tough questions, without someone investing money and taking the time it takes to develop a story, without someone trying to objectively get to the Truly, without complicated analysis – what we are getting is more and more. . . entertainment.
It is pretty scary to me that while we have the fastest and most democratic technology for dissemination of the news, we are dismantling the very structure that provides us with more than celebrity, sports, sensation, sex, hawking of products and such. Now, on the other hand, I go to Twitter and I can see videos right from the streets of Iran! In seconds they are up on You Tube and the Iranian government can’t stop it. That is encouraging – but someone needs to develop a media model that creates an income stream from actual, in depth, investigation of stories. Perhaps on line subscriptions will have to be the answer. So far people don’t want to “pay for news” however, and advertising isn’t covering it.
(Sorry if that got to preachy but I think the issue is a major one.)
If you see social implications (good or bad) to these types of tools.
It is good in that people can get the news they want. I’m all for freedom and democracy and this is an example – however – it is not all good, in my view. With these services I can tailor the news to only be the news I want to hear, or the source, or biases I am comfortable with. Much of the objectivity is gone when I only get my news from a specific political, social etc. forum.
On the other hand, this opens up more resources than people have had in the past so maybe the end result is more information in general and perhaps, more exposure to other ideas. But if there are only a few sources for news (and everyone else just “copies and pastes” what they get from these, then even if you have 500 “sources of news” you are still only hearing one or two points of view. The great thing is that if you look for them, you can find alternative news as well.
I think they are great – but like any great ideas, they contain new issues for society to deal with.
No Comments »
Filed under: Uncategorized